Abstract
This paper examines managers' strategic use of financial disclosure in labor negotiations. Using the exogenous expiration date of collective bargaining contracts, I find that when wage negotiations are imminent, firms strategically redact information about material agreements. Strategic redaction is pronounced when unions cannot accurately predict firms' prospects, when firms have low growth opportunities, when liquidity is less constrained, and when the estimated cost of a work stoppage is low. These results suggest that firms strategically withhold information to balance the costs and benefits of information asymmetry. Consistent with this interpretation, strategic disclosure is statistically uncorrelated to ex post performance.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
