Abstract

Consistent between-individual differences in behaviour, known as personality differences, are heritable and have consequences for individual survival and reproductive success. Therefore, it is likely that personality differences are not just under natural but also under sexual selection. Indeed, the recently developed idea that individuals choose their mate based on its personality finds empirical support. However, most studies on mate choice based on personality traits are correlative pioneering work and there is a paucity of experimental studies that test for causality by disentangling personality measures from other, potentially correlated traits that may be important during mate choice. Here, we tested female preference for the apparent level and consistency of either male aggression (measured as mean distance of approach towards an animated opponent, manipulated by locating males at a fixed distance) or male boldness (measured as activity under a simulated predation threat, manipulated using a gradient in ambient water temperature) in a bi-parental West African cichlid, Pelvicachromis pulcher. Females could observe the apparent behaviour of paired stimulus males and were allowed to choose between the two stimulus males in a subsequent choice test. We found no direct effect of male apparent aggression/boldness on female choice, but an indirect effect such that female preference for the apparently bold male increased with increasing within-male pair contrast in their apparent level of boldness. Our results indicate females consider male boldness per se during mate choice, suggesting male boldness is sexually selected in our study species.Significance statementEver since Darwin introduced the concept of sexual selection, female choice has been studied extensively. However, the hypothesis that consistent between-individual differences in behaviour (known as personality differences) affect mate choice is relatively new. Correlative studies support this idea but provide only suggestive evidence. Here, we used behavioural manipulations in order to disentangle male behaviour from other, potentially correlated male traits, allowing us to test for causality between female choice and personality differences in male aggression and boldness (both in level and consistency of behaviour) in a bi-parental cichlid. We found no overall female preference for male apparent behaviour, but female preference for the bold-appearing male increased with increasing between-male contrast in apparent boldness. Our results indicate a causal link between female choice and male boldness. In future, behavioural manipulations using a temperature gradient could provide further valuable insights.

Highlights

  • Previous studies showed that personality traits, such as boldness (Godin and Dugatkin 1996; Scherer et al 2017b), aggression (Ophir and Galef 2003; Kralj-Fišer et al 2013) and exploratory behaviour (Schuett et al 2011b; Pogány et al 2018), affect mate choice in several species

  • Existing studies have often focused on potential effects of the behavioural level of a given personality trait on female mating preferences while neglecting the importance of individual differences in the consistency of its expression

  • We found no deviation from random female preference for either the level or consistency of male apparent aggression (Table 2, Fig. 3a)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Consistent differences in individual behaviour, known as personality differences, temperaments or coping styles (Gosling 2001; Réale et al 2007), are moderately heritable (Ariyomo et al 2013; Patrick et al 2013) and have diverse fitness consequences (Dingemanse and Réale 2005; Smith and Blumstein 2008; Ariyomo and Watt 2012), including various effects on reproductive success (e.g. Spoon et al 2006; Schuett et al 2011a; Cain and Ketterson 2013; Laubu et al 2016). Previous studies on mate choice for aggressiveness and boldness have revealed either directional (Scherer et al 2018a), assortative (KraljFišer et al 2013; Pogány et al 2018), dis-assortative (Scherer et al 2017b) or no effects (Laubu et al 2017; Scherer and Schuett 2018) of individual behavioural types on mating preferences. Existing studies have often focused on potential effects of the behavioural level of a given personality trait on female mating preferences while neglecting the importance of individual differences in the consistency of its expression (but see Scherer et al 2017b, 2018a). Such experimental evidence for mating preferences for behavioural traits barely exists (Godin and Dugatkin 1996; Schuett et al 2011b)

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call