Abstract

This study examines the role of PCAOB inspection reports as a regulatory and monitoring mechanism. Specifically, I examine whether the issuance of PCAOB inspection reports with fair value deficiencies results in increased auditor scrutiny of fair value estimates and ultimately reduce the information uncertainty associated with level 2 and level 3 fair value estimates. Using models derived from Fields, Fraser and Wilkins (2004) and Riedl and Serafeim (2011), I predict and find evidence that corroborates a positive and significant audit effort (as proxied by audit fees) associated with level 3 fair value estimates after the issuance of a fair value inspection report. I also find a reduction in the information uncertainty associated with level 2 and level 3 fair value estimates (as proxied by implied asset-specific betas). Upon further subsample analysis, I find these results are driven by issuer clients that engage annually inspected audit firms versus those that engage triennially inspected audit firms.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.