Do enzyme activities during decomposition follow predicted patterns? A test of the conceptual model of litter decay.

Abstract

AbstractSurprisingly, there remains a paucity of research examining specific interactions between the relationship between microbial community behavior and plant litter chemistry during decomposition. A more mechanistic understanding of the relationship between these drivers will ultimately help determine the trajectory of litter decomposition and the conditions in which soils serve as either a source or sink for atmospheric C. In order to examine these relationships, a laboratory incubation was established using Acer saccharum litter and a sandy soil (< 1.5% organic matter). Extracellular enzyme activities ([BETA]-glucosidase, N-acetyl glucosaminidase, leucine-amino peptidase, acid phosphatase, phenol oxidase, and peroxidase) were monitored on a consistent basis along with instantaneous rates of carbon dioxide production, microbial biomass (carbon and nitrogen) and phospholipid fatty acid biomarkers (PLFA), and nitrogen and phosphorus availability. Microbial biomass and microbial respiration peaked within the first week of the experiment. This was likely due to the high availability of water soluble substrates early in decay that can be obtained without the production of extracellular enzymes. [BETA]-glucosidase (BG), N-acetyl glucosaminadase (NAG), and acid phosphatase activities increased quickly following the first week and peaked within the first month (at approximately 15% mass loss). Leucine amino peptidase was not detected during the incubation, which may be due to its strong positive correlation with soil pH, while other hydrolytic enzymes tend to track concentrations of soil organic matter. Phenol oxidase and peroxidase activities were not measurable until the second month of the experiment (> 25% mass loss), likely following the depletion of more labile substrates. A second increase in BG activity was observed between Days 83-111, which may be due to an increase in the availability of cellulose that was previously shielded by lignin, since oxidative enzyme activity was first detected on Day 68. We also observed some shifts in microbial PLFAs along with enzyme activities during decomposition. Prior to the increases in enzyme activity we observed a high proportion of PLFA 18:1[omega]7c, which is a bacterial biomarker. As enzyme activities increased, we observed a decrease in this biomarker and an increase in 18:2[omega]6,9c, a fungal biomarker that was correlated with BG and NAG activity. We did not observe any clear relationships between PLFAs and lignolytic enzyme activity, however. Overall, we observed a distinct functional shift in microbial substrate use that may be associated with either changes in composition of the microbial community or community shifts in enzyme production.