Do dominant group members have different emotional responses to observing dominant-on-dominantversus dominant-on-disadvantagedostracism? Some evidence for heightened reactivity to potentially discriminatory ingroup behavior.

Corey Petsnik,Jacquie D Vorauer,Jan De Houwer

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0234540

Abstract

The importance of social connection to well-being is underscored by individuals’ reactivity to events highlighting the potential for rejection and exclusion, which extends even to observing the social exclusion of others (“vicarious ostracism”). Because responses to vicarious ostracism depend at least in part on empathy with the target, and individuals tend to empathize less readily with outgroup than ingroup members, the question arises as to whether there is a boundary condition on vicarious ostracism effects whereby individuals are relatively immune to observing ingroup-on-outgroup ostracism. Of particular interest is the case where members of a dominant ethnic group observe fellow ingroup members ostracize a member of a disadvantaged ethnic minority group, as here there is a compelling potential alternative: Perceived violation of contemporary social norms condemning prejudice and discrimination might instead lead dominant group members to be especially upset by “dominant-on-disadvantaged” ostracism. Accordingly, the present research examines, across four studies and 4413 participants, individuals’ affective reactions to observing dominant-on-disadvantaged versus dominant-on-dominant ostracism. In each study, dominant group members (White/Europeans) observed dominant group members include or ostracize a fellow dominant group member or a disadvantaged ethnic minority group member (a Black individual) in an online Cyberball game. Results revealed that dominant group members felt more guilt, anger, and sadness after observing severe ostracism of a disadvantaged as opposed to dominant group member. Although no direct effects emerged on behavioral outcomes, exploratory analyses suggested that observing ostracism of a disadvantaged (versus dominant) group member had indirect effects on behavior via increased feelings of anger. These results suggest that observing ostracism may be a sufficiently potent and relatable experience that when it occurs across group boundaries it awakens individuals’ sensitivity to injustice and discrimination.

Highlights

Social connections are profoundly important to mental and physical well-being [1]
Across four studies involving over 4000 participants from university and community samples we found that after observing a severe act of ostracism perpetrated by fellow dominant group members, White individuals reported significantly more feelings of guilt, anger, and sadness when the target was an ethnic minority as opposed to a White person
It is notable that, consistent with the possibility that individuals experienced a social identity threat in response to witnessing the potentially prejudiced behavior of fellow dominant group members, we found that White individuals derogated a Black relative to a White target of severe ostracism

Summary

Introduction

Social connections are profoundly important to mental and physical well-being [1]. relations and interactions with others help ground a fundamental aspect of individuals’ selfperception: Individuals’ own feelings of self-esteem are heavily intertwined with their feelings of being socially accepted or rejected [2]. Attesting to the deeply ingrained and automatic nature of such sensitivity, it applies even in cases where negative treatment is plausibly directed toward others instead of oneself, or comes from an unimportant or despised other or a computer [3,4,5,6,7]. This sensitivity goes further yet: Individuals who observe another person being ostracized– even when there is no potential for personally being a target of mistreatment themselves–experience reduced satisfaction of fundamental needs (e.g., belonging and self-esteem) and more negative mood [8]. Such “vicarious ostracism” has been found across observers of various ages, ranging from children to adults [9] and at times appears to be just as potent as being directly targeted [10]

Objectives

Results

Discussion

Conclusion