Abstract
We examine the role of outside directors’ interlocks, in restoring directors’ indemnification protection in response to the Delaware case Schoon v. Troy Corp. The case, which permitted a board to alter indemnification and advancement of expenses arrangements for a former director retroactively, left directors vulnerable unless their firm acted to restore protection. Using a hand-collected data set, we find that firms became more than two times as likely to adopt enhanced indemnification protection once a firm with which they share an outside director adopted protection. Our results suggest that interlocks contribute to outside directors’ knowledge and bargaining power within the boardroom. Consistent with the bargaining power hypothesis we find that other measures of outside directors’ power: (i) a large proportion of outside directors; (ii) a designated independent lead director, and, with marginal significance, (iii) more board meetings in executive session. These results have legal and practical implications for corporate governance.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.