Do currently recommended Bayley-III cutoffs overestimate motor impairment in infants born

Abstract

ObjectiveTo determine whether a Bayley-III Motor Composite score of 85 may overestimate moderate-severe motor impairment by analyzing Bayley-III motor components and developing cut-point scores for each.Study DesignRetrospective study of 1183 children born <27 weeks gestation at NICHD Neonatal Research Network centers and evaluated at 18-22 months corrected age. Gross Motor Function Classification System determined gross motor impairment. Statistical analyses included linear and logistic regression and sensitivity/specificity.ResultsBayley-III Motor Composite scores were strong indicators of gross/fine motor impairment. A Motor Composite cut-point of 73 markedly improved specificity for identifying gross and/or fine motor impairment (94% compared with a specificity of 76% for the proposed new cut point of 85). A Fine Motor Scaled Score <3 differentiated mild from moderate-severe fine motor impairment.ConclusionsThis study indicates that a Bayley-III Motor Composite Score of 85 may overestimate impairment. Further studies are needed employing term controls and longer follow-up.