Do Certain Patient Cohorts Benefit From Different Surgical Approaches in Total Hip Arthroplasty?

Abstract

BackgroundUnfortunately, an important minority of total hip arthroplasty (THA) patients report unsatisfactory outcomes. We aimed to compare the patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) for three main THA approaches and evaluate the effect of sex and body mass index (BMI) on PROMs over a 10-year period. MethodsA total of 906 patients (535 women, mean BMI 30.7 [range, 15 to 58]; 371 men, mean BMI 31.2 [range, 17 to 56]) who underwent primary THA by an anterior (AA) (312), lateral (LA) (211), or posterior (383) approach between 2009 and 2020 at a single institution were evaluated using the Oxford Hip Score (OHS). PROMs were prospectively collected before surgery and routinely at 6 weeks, 6 months, and 1, 2, 5, and 10 years after surgery. ResultsAll three approaches resulted in significant postoperative OHS improvement. Overall, women experienced significantly lower OHS than men (P < .01). A significant negative relationship between BMI and OHS was identified and this relationship was exacerbated with an AA (P < .01). Women who had a BMI ≤ 25 reported OHS with a difference more than 5 points in favor of the AA, while women who had a BMI ≥ 42 reported an OHS with a difference more than 5 in favor of the LA. The BMI ranges were wider when comparing the anterior and posterior approaches, 22 to 46 for women and > 50 for men. For men, an OHS difference more than 5 was only seen with BMI ≥ 45 in favor of the LA. ConclusionThis study demonstrated that no single THA approach is superior to another but rather that certain patient cohorts may benefit more from specific approaches. We suggest that women who have a BMI ≤ 25 should consider undergoing an anterior approach for THA, while for women who have a BMI ≥ 42, a lateral approach or for a BMI ≥ 46, a posterior approach is advised.