Abstract
Abstract Within the past several decades, resource trade‐offs have emerged as the commonly accepted explanation for how carotenoid‐based coloration links to individual performance. However, the literature on carotenoid signalling is inconsistent in how carotenoid resource trade‐offs are defined, assessed and interpreted. We provide a clear statement of the resource trade‐off hypothesis for explaining the honesty of carotenoid‐based ornaments, its key assumptions and evidence for (or against) each assumption. Focusing on class Aves, we perform a critical assessment of theoretical and empirical evidence for carotenoid resource limitation and for direct physiological benefits of carotenoid pigments to immune and antioxidant performance. We identify important inconsistencies in how data related to physiological function and carotenoid coloration have been interpreted in the light of the resource trade‐off hypothesis, and we suggest directions for future research. A plain language summary is available for this article.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
