Abstract
Consistent with the idea that some of the noise in analysts' earnings forecasts originates in their geographic locations, we find that when analysts' locations are geographically more dispersed, the consensus forecast is more accurate, suggesting a diversification effect. Importantly, analysts' individual forecasts are also more accurate, implying that analysts incorporate idiosyncratic (private) information in their peer's forecasts when generating their own forecasts. Moreover, in line with efficient weighted average forecasting behavior, the weights assigned to peer forecasts vary with measures of the precision of the analyst's signal and those of the peers. Overall, we find strong evidence of analyst learning.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
