Abstract

For this paper, three waves of the Thai Socio-Economic Panel Survey data which cover the years 2005-2007, are used for the first time to examine risk sharing through many specifications. The findings show that the null hypothesis of full insurance against income shock is rejected for the whole country case together with a group consisting of a sample from the Central, Eastern and Western regions. This rejection, nevertheless, is supported by the existence of evidence of partial insurance for the whole country case. Unlike income shock, a specific adverse shock, which uses the illness of the household head as a proxy, is fully insured by households for all region groups except a group consisting of a sample from the Central, Eastern and Western regions.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.