Abstract

BackgroundMany reports noted a disagreement between High sensitivity cardiac Troponin (hs-cTn) assays on the diagnosis of Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS). MethodsWe conducted a retrospective study aiming to assess the agreement between hs-cTn T (Roche) and hs-cTn I (Abbott) in patients presenting with a suspected ACS to the emergency department at Hotel-Dieu hospital between September 2017 and October 2019 using overall, sex-specific, and age-adjusted sex-specific cut-off values. This was measured using Cohen’s Kappa. We explored whether renal function, circadian rhythm, age and sex influenced the discordance. And we analyzed the trend of agreement between baseline and repeated measurements. Results4856 patients who had simultaneous hs-cTn I and T values were retained for the analysis. 53.5% had a hs-cTn T above the overall 99th percentile, compared to 19.9% for hs-cTn I. The numbers were significantly reduced when applying age-adjusted sex-specific 99th percentile.A disagreement was seen in 34% of cases using overall 99th percentile. Using sex-specific cut off values did not impact this discordance; however, age-adjusted sex-specific cut-off values reduced the percentage of discrepancies to 15.8%. The decreased renal function had a negative effect on the agreement while the circadian rhythm had minimal effect. This initial discordance was carried forward into repeated measurements. ConclusionThe disagreement between hs-cTn T and I assays could be imputed to the choice of cut-off values. The use of age-adjusted sex specific 99th percentile reduced majorly these discordances. Further studies are needed in order to evaluate their clinical utility in patients presenting with ACS.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.