Abstract

The Heart Outcomes Prevention (HOPE) trial was the first to demonstrate the benefits of the angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor ramipril for high-risk cardiovascular patients. Whether the cardioprotective effects seen in HOPE and other trials are specific to distinct ACE inhibitors remains controversial. Evidence of a lack of class effect for ACE inhibitors has policy and financial implications related to reference pricing by insurers and inclusion on pharmacy formularies. Because head-to-head trials comparing the different ACE inhibitors are unforeseen, clinicians and administrators must rely on secondary-level data and observational studies. Only a handful of studies have sought to address the dispute over a class effect among ACE inhibitors, which is reviewed in this article.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.