Abstract

BackgroundNanopore long-read sequencing technology greatly expands the capacity of long-range, single-molecule DNA-modification detection. A growing number of analytical tools have been developed to detect DNA methylation from nanopore sequencing reads. Here, we assess the performance of different methylation-calling tools to provide a systematic evaluation to guide researchers performing human epigenome-wide studies.ResultsWe compare seven analytic tools for detecting DNA methylation from nanopore long-read sequencing data generated from human natural DNA at a whole-genome scale. We evaluate the per-read and per-site performance of CpG methylation prediction across different genomic contexts, CpG site coverage, and computational resources consumed by each tool. The seven tools exhibit different performances across the evaluation criteria. We show that the methylation prediction at regions with discordant DNA methylation patterns, intergenic regions, low CG density regions, and repetitive regions show room for improvement across all tools. Furthermore, we demonstrate that 5hmC levels at least partly contribute to the discrepancy between bisulfite and nanopore sequencing. Lastly, we provide an online DNA methylation database (https://nanome.jax.org) to display the DNA methylation levels detected by nanopore sequencing and bisulfite sequencing data across different genomic contexts.ConclusionsOur study is the first systematic benchmark of computational methods for detection of mammalian whole-genome DNA modifications in nanopore sequencing. We provide a broad foundation for cross-platform standardization and an evaluation of analytical tools designed for genome-scale modified base detection using nanopore sequencing.

Highlights

  • Nanopore long-read sequencing technology greatly expands the capacity of long-range, single-molecule DNA-modification detection

  • Ten tools are compatible with R9.4 series flow cells, and nine of these ten can predict 5-methylcytosine (5mC)

  • We compared the performance of those seven state-of-the-art methylation-calling tools targeting 5mCs in different CpG contexts; those seven tools are all compatible with the most favored Oxford Nanopore Technologies (ONT) flow cell version (R9.4 and R9.4.1 pores): Nanopolish [9], Megalodon [36], DeepSignal [35], Guppy [32, 51], Tombo/Nanoraw [20], DeepMod [34], and METEORE [38] (Fig. 1B)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Nanopore long-read sequencing technology greatly expands the capacity of long-range, single-molecule DNA-modification detection. A growing number of analytical tools have been developed to detect DNA methylation from nanopore sequencing reads. DNA methylation measurement has traditionally depended on the combination of bisulfite conversion (which can damage DNA) and next-generation sequencing (which detects only short-range methylation patterns) [5]. SMRT sequencing can detect 5mC modifications based on polymerase kinetics at 250× coverage [8] This detection is not the result of direct 5mC detection at single-molecule resolution but rather the aggregation of the subtle impact of 5mC on polymerase kinetics signals during DNA synthesis [8]. The requirement for high coverage and inability of direct single-molecule 5mC detection by SMRT is a limitation [9]. While SMRT-based bisulfite sequencing allows sequencing of up to ~ 2 kilobases (kb) in length, it relies on bisulfite conversion [10]

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call