Abstract

Achieving cancer prognosis and molecular typing is critical for cancer treatment. Previous studies have identified some gene signatures for the prognosis and typing of cancer based on gene expression data. Some studies have shown that DNA methylation is associated with cancer development, progression, and metastasis. In addition, DNA methylation data are more stable than gene expression data in cancer prognosis. Therefore, in this work, we focused on DNA methylation data. Some prior researches have shown that gene modules are more reliable in cancer prognosis than are gene signatures and that gene modules are not isolated. However, few studies have considered cross-talk among the gene modules, which may allow some important gene modules for cancer to be overlooked. Therefore, we constructed a gene co-methylation network based on the DNA methylation data of cancer patients, and detected the gene modules in the co-methylation network. Then, by permutation testing, cross-talk between every two modules was identified; thus, the module network was generated. Next, the core gene modules in the module network of cancer were identified using the K-shell method, and these core gene modules were used as features to study the prognosis and molecular typing of cancer. Our method was applied in three types of cancer (breast invasive carcinoma, skin cutaneous melanoma, and uterine corpus endometrial carcinoma). Based on the core gene modules identified by the constructed DNA methylation module networks, we can distinguish not only the prognosis of cancer patients but also use them for molecular typing of cancer. These results indicated that our method has important application value for the diagnosis of cancer and may reveal potential carcinogenic mechanisms.

Highlights

  • The most important concern for cancer patients is to understand the likely course and chances of recovery, which is the prognosis of cancer

  • DNA Methylation Data are More Stable in Cancer Prognosis

  • We systematically evaluated the stability of gene expression data and DNA methylation data for three cancers by the overlap of the prognostic genes selected from different samples

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The most important concern for cancer patients is to understand the likely course and chances of recovery, which is the prognosis of cancer. Many factors affect the prognosis of cancer [1]. The heterogeneity of cancer makes it impossible to assess tumors by relying on limited clinical indicators, which reflects the need to study cancer at the molecular level [2]. The rapid development of high-throughput sequencing technology and microarray technology has enabled researchers to systematically study cancer at the molecular level. Molecular biomarkers that predict the prognosis of cancer patients are found based on gene expression data [3,4]. These prognostic genes often have poor generalization ability [5], and most of these genes are not oncogenes but noise signals [6].

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call