DNA methylation clustered by predicted chromatin state reveals distinct association patterns with neuropathologic and biochemical measures in the AD brain

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundAlzheimer’s disease (AD) is neuropathologically characterized by amyloid‐β (Aβ) plaques and tau neurofibrillary tangles often quantified by Thal phase and Braak stage, respectively. Aβ also frequently deposits in the cerebrovasculature with severity categorized by a cerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA) score. These and related measures often show high variability within AD suggesting distinct underlying mechanisms, the identification of which may reveal important biological insights into AD pathophysiology. We hypothesize that, within the AD brain, neuropathology and levels of core AD‐related proteins are influenced by variations in DNA methylation (DNAm). To test this, we performed epigenome‐wide association studies (EWAS) using DNAm clusters from the temporal cortex (TCX) and cerebellum (CER) with AD‐related neuropathologic measures (Braak, Thal, and CAA) and brain biochemical levels of five proteins (apoE, Aβ40, Aβ42, tau, and p‐tau).MethodsDNAm from neuropathologically‐confirmed AD cases available through the Mayo Clinic brain bank was measured by reduced representation bisulfite sequencing (RRBS) from 471 brain samples, 200 of which had both TCX and CER measures. Neuropathology was scored by an experienced neuropathologist. TCX levels of five AD‐related proteins from three tissue fractions (buffer‐, detergent‐, and in‐soluble) were measured by ELISA (Liu 2020). CpG methylation (CpGm) was binned by a 15‐state chromatin model (Kundaje 2015) and averaged. Averaged CpGm clusters were tested for their association with each endophenotype through multi‐variable linear regression. The influence of CpGm clusters on expression levels of nearby genes was also investigated through multi‐variable regression.ResultsOur innovative binning method demonstrated expected and biologically relevant CpGm patterns. We identified multiple epigenome‐wide significant CpGm clusters unique to each AD‐related endophenotype and brain region. Comparisons between the TCX and CER further revealed brain region‐specific enrichment of distinct CpGm clusters. Significant CpGm clusters were further characterized by their influence on gene expression.ConclusionsAlthough all neuropathologic and biochemical endophenotypes tested are core to AD pathophysiology, our results suggest each has a distinct epigenetic architecture underlying their variability in the AD brain. By discovering brain region‐specific DNAm changes that contribute to each neuropathologic or biochemical outcome, we can identify core components of complex mechanisms that individually and jointly contribute to AD.