Abstract

BackgroundWe present a method that utilizes DNA methylation profiling for prediction of the cytogenetic subtypes of acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) cells from pediatric ALL patients. The primary aim of our study was to improve risk stratification of ALL patients into treatment groups using DNA methylation as a complement to current diagnostic methods. A secondary aim was to gain insight into the functional role of DNA methylation in ALL.ResultsWe used the methylation status of ~450,000 CpG sites in 546 well-characterized patients with T-ALL or seven recurrent B-cell precursor ALL subtypes to design and validate sensitive and accurate DNA methylation classifiers. After repeated cross-validation, a final classifier was derived that consisted of only 246 CpG sites. The mean sensitivity and specificity of the classifier across the known subtypes was 0.90 and 0.99, respectively. We then used DNA methylation classification to screen for subtype membership of 210 patients with undefined karyotype (normal or no result) or non-recurrent cytogenetic aberrations (‘other’ subtype). Nearly half (n = 106) of the patients lacking cytogenetic subgrouping displayed highly similar methylation profiles as the patients in the known recurrent groups. We verified the subtype of 20% of the newly classified patients by examination of diagnostic karyotypes, array-based copy number analysis, and detection of fusion genes by quantitative polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and RNA-sequencing (RNA-seq). Using RNA-seq data from ALL patients where cytogenetic subtype and DNA methylation classification did not agree, we discovered several novel fusion genes involving ETV6, RUNX1, and PAX5.ConclusionsOur findings indicate that DNA methylation profiling contributes to the clarification of the heterogeneity in cytogenetically undefined ALL patient groups and could be implemented as a complementary method for diagnosis of ALL. The results of our study provide clues to the origin and development of leukemic transformation. The methylation status of the CpG sites constituting the classifiers also highlight relevant biological characteristics in otherwise unclassified ALL patients.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13148-014-0039-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Highlights

  • We present a method that utilizes DNA methylation profiling for prediction of the cytogenetic subtypes of acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) cells from pediatric ALL patients

  • We and others have previously observed a strong correlation between cytogenetic subtype and DNA methylation in ALL, which indicates that DNA methylation profiling may serve as a proxy for cytogenetic analysis [11,12,14,18]

  • We found that several of the patients assigned to the ‘multi-class’ group according to the DNA methylation classifier harbored fusion genes with PAX5 as one of the fusion partners, including the known t(9;12) PAX5/ETV6 and inv(9p13.2)PAX5/ZCCHC7 fusion genes previously reported in ALL [19,20,21]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

We present a method that utilizes DNA methylation profiling for prediction of the cytogenetic subtypes of acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) cells from pediatric ALL patients. The primary aim of our study was to improve risk stratification of ALL patients into treatment groups using DNA methylation as a complement to current diagnostic methods. The genetic subtypes of pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) are characterized by large-scale chromosomal aberrations, such as aneuploidies and translocations [1,2,3]. Therapy intensity for ALL patients is determined by risk assessment based on presenting features, such as white blood cell count, B- or T-lineage, genetic aberrations, and minimal residual disease after induction treatment [4,5]. 15% of ALL patients harbor complex, non-recurrent genomic aberrations and would benefit from improved diagnostic subtyping to identify potential high-risk aberrations. We and others have previously observed a strong correlation between cytogenetic subtype and DNA methylation in ALL, which indicates that DNA methylation profiling may serve as a proxy for cytogenetic analysis [11,12,14,18]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call