Abstract

Animal identification is essential in a large number of forensic cases, including bush meat harvest, unregulated trade in protected species or species’ derivatives, introduction of exotic species without a proper permit and food fraud. The analysis of morphological traits has been the most traditional method used for species identification and taxonomy. However, when morphological identification is compromised, genetic identification can be used to associate sequences from unknown samples to a sequence from a reference sample. Based on a standard region of 650 base pairs of the subunit I of cytochrome c oxidase mitochondrial gene (COI) and using a validated reference database, the DNA Barcoding system for cataloging and identifying animal species has been proposed. In order to test the utility of DNA Barcoding in forensic vertebrate species identification, COI sequences from previously identified samples from human and a variety of domestic and wild specimens of Brazilian mammals, birds, fishes were compared against the Barcode of Life Database (BOLD). BOLD provided a correct species-level identification for 12 out of the 20 queried sequences (60%) and presented the correct species as the best matched one for 17 out of 18 samples morphologically identified to this level (94%). Cases where BOLD did not deliver a species level identification were associated with the controversial taxonomic status of some species, the possible occurrence of a biological event like hybridization and the lack of representation of some groups in the database. The results showed that DNA Barcoding is already effective for species identification in many cases and, although presenting some limitations, the use of the tool must be improved and widespread in forensic casework.

Highlights

  • Animal identification is essential in a large number of forensic cases, including bushmeat harvest, the unregulated trade in protected species or its derivatives and the introduction of exotic species without a proper permit, activities that threaten the survival of natural populations and cause damages to the ecosystems[1,2,3]

  • Even without providing a species level identification in eight cases, Barcode of Life Database (BOLD) searches resulted in the correct species being presented as the best matched for 17 out of 18 samples morphologically identified to this level (94%)

  • In one case the best matched species did not correspond to the sample identity, but BOLD presented a same genus species (Table 02)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Animal identification is essential in a large number of forensic cases, including bushmeat harvest, the unregulated trade in protected species or its derivatives and the introduction of exotic species without a proper permit, activities that threaten the survival of natural populations and cause damages to the ecosystems[1,2,3]. The analysis of morphological traits has been the most traditional method used for species identification and taxonomy[6,7]. Characteristics such as size, shape and structures present in the bodies of animals can be used to identify the species in most cases. Morphology based identification requires certain conditions, including the existence of distinctive features inherent to a single species, the presence of such features in the specimen being examined and sometimes very specific taxonomic knowledge, which makes the identification of cryptic species, immature individuals and animal parts, products or fluids extremely difficult in many situations[6,8]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call