Abstract
BackgroundTaxonomy that utilizes morphological characteristics has been the gold standard method to identify mosquito species. However, morphological identification is challenging when the expertise is limited and external characters are damaged because of improper specimen handling. Therefore, we explored the applicability of mitochondrial cytochrome C oxidase subunit 1 (COI) gene-based DNA barcoding as an alternative tool to identify mosquito species. In the present study, we compared the morphological identification of mosquito specimens with their differentiation based on COI barcode, in order to establish a more reliable identification system for mosquito species found in Singapore.MethodsWe analysed 128 adult mosquito specimens, belonging to 45 species of 13 genera. Phylogenetic trees were constructed for Aedes, Anopheles, Culex and other genera of mosquitoes and the distinctive clustering of different species was compared with their taxonomic identity.ResultsThe COI-based DNA barcoding achieved a 100% success rate in identifying the mosquito species. We also report COI barcode sequences of 16 mosquito species which were not available previously in sequence databases.ConclusionsOur study utilised for the first time DNA barcoding to identify mosquito species in Singapore. COI-based DNA barcoding is a useful tool to complement taxonomy-based identification of mosquito species.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13071-014-0569-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Highlights
Taxonomy that utilizes morphological characteristics has been the gold standard method to identify mosquito species
Laboratory strains of several mosquito species, namely Aedes (Stegomyia) aegypti (Linneaus, 1762), Anopheles (Anopheles) sinensis (Wiedemann, 1828), Culex (Culex) vishnui (Theobald, 1901), Culex (Culex) pseudovishnui (Colless, 1957) Culex (Culex) quinquefasciatus (Say, 1823), Lutzia (Metalutzia) fuscana (Wiedermann, 1820) and Culex (Culex) mimulus (Edwards, 1915) that were colonised at the Environmental Health Institute (EHI) were included in our analysis
We demonstrated that mitochondrial C oxidase subunit 1 (COI) gene-based DNA barcoding was comparable to morphological identification for the differentiation of 45 mosquito species analysed
Summary
Taxonomy that utilizes morphological characteristics has been the gold standard method to identify mosquito species. Morphological identification is challenging when the expertise is limited and external characters are damaged because of improper specimen handling. Morphological identification is the conventional, gold standard method to identify mosquito species based on their external characters. Similar morphological characters shared by DNA barcoding is a molecular method that is becoming increasingly popular for the identification of animal species, based on partial mitochondrial DNA sequences [10,11]. This method is based on the concept that every
Full Text
Topics from this Paper
Species In Singapore
Mosquito Species
DNA Barcoding
Identification Of Mosquito Species
Genera Of Mosquitoes
+ Show 5 more
Create a personalized feed of these topics
Get StartedTalk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Similar Papers
Insects
Jan 20, 2023
Parasites & Vectors
Nov 22, 2022
PLOS ONE
Sep 22, 2022
Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland)
Apr 19, 2022
Pathogens
Apr 19, 2022
Molecular Ecology Resources
Sep 15, 2014
Bioinformation
Aug 31, 2005
ZooKeys
Mar 19, 2019
Acta Tropica
Jan 1, 2021
Parasites & Vectors
Apr 25, 2018
Medical and Veterinary Entomology
Dec 12, 2015
Parasites & Vectors
Parasites & Vectors
Nov 1, 2023
Parasites & Vectors
Jul 10, 2023
Parasites & Vectors
Dec 8, 2022
Parasites & Vectors
Sep 26, 2022
Parasites & Vectors
Jul 4, 2022
Parasites & Vectors
Jun 30, 2022
Parasites & Vectors
Jun 30, 2022
Parasites & Vectors
Jun 27, 2022
Parasites & Vectors
Jun 24, 2022
Parasites & Vectors
Jun 20, 2022