DNA B to D transition can be explained in terms of hydration economy of the minor groove atoms

Abstract

Adjacent phosphate oxygen atoms in A and Z-DNA are located much closer together than in the B form and can be hydrated more economically due to the formation of water bridges between them, whereas in the B form phosphates are hydrated individually. This principle of hydration economy of phosphate groups discovered by Saenger and colleagues could not be applied to the B- D transition, which, like the B- A and B- Z transitions, occurs in a situation of water deficiency, because the distances between adjacent phosphates of individual polynucleotide chains in the D form are not much different from B-DNA. It follows from our calculations of B and D-DNA accessibility to solvent performed by the method of Lee & Richards, and from a simulation of solvent structure near DNA, that there is an economy of hydration only for the minor groove atoms. This feature and some experimental data can explain why only a limited range of sequences consisting of A · T or I · C pairs undergo the transition to the D form. The conformational transition in DNAs with such sequences to a poly[d(A)] · poly[d(T)]-like conformation ( B h -DNA), which is accompanied by a narrowing of the minor groove, can be explained in the same way. Calculations suggest that in the D-form minor groove of different A-T or I-C DNAs there is a double-layer hydration spine similar to that observed by Drew & Dickerson in the A-T tract of the d(C-G-C-G-A-A-T-T-C-G-C-G) dodecamer. The B- D and B- B h transitions in A + T-rich DNAs can have biological implications, e.g. they can facilitate DNA bending upon the interaction with proteins.