Abstract

This study was aimed at examining the differences between dividend policy determinants pre- and post-Malaysian Code on Corporate Governance (MCCG) 2012. Several factors, including profitability, lagged dividend, free cash flow, debt, firm size, investment opportunities and market risk were tested. The study investigated a total number of 631 non-financial firms in Malaysia that covered 7830 firm-year observations from 2005 to 2011 (pre-MCCG) and from 2013 to 2019 (post-MCCG). The study used pooled Ordinary Least Square (OLS) and random and fixed effect, with a robust standard error. The results demonstrated that from seven factors tested only four factors were found to be significant in determining dividend policy in pre-MCCG, and five factors in post MCCG. The pre-MCCG test revealed that before the revised MCCG 2012, the factors determining dividend policy were as follows: profitability, lagged dividend, debt, and firm size. However, there were slight changes in the range of determinants affecting dividend policy, Post-MCCG 2012. The post MCCG test revealed that profitability, lagged of dividend, and firm size consistently determined firm dividend policy; however, debt was no longer a significant determinant of dividend policy post MCCG. Additionally, investment opportunity and market risk were found to be significant determinants of dividend policy post-MCCG in 2012.

Highlights

  • Dividend policy has been listed as the top ten unresolved issues in the world of corporate finance (Brealey & Myers, 2005)

  • The results revealed that dividend policy determinants remained persistent even after controlling for endogeneity concerns regarding omitted variables bias both in pre-and-post Malaysian Code on Corporate Governance (MCCG) 2012, as represented via model VII and model VIII

  • This study investigated the factors that might influence firm dividend policy in Malaysia

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Dividend policy has been listed as the top ten unresolved issues in the world of corporate finance (Brealey & Myers, 2005). If assuming a firm has decided to pay a dividend; in this case, the firm would have less financial capability to finance its investment opportunities. Several past empirical studies have revealed that a dividend policy could be affected by profitability, debt level, firm size, investment opportunity and cash flow. According to Bakri et al (2019), the dividend could be used as a substitute for weak governance to maintain a good relationship with shareholders. This implied that the governance or corporate governance could influence a firm’s dividend in policy to a certain degree. Strong governance has been posited as significantly influencing a firms’ intention to pay more dividends (Mitton 2004; Petrasek, 2012)

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call