Abstract

Abstract. Compared to monocultures, diverse ecosystems are often expected to show more comprehensive resource use. However, with respect to diversity–soil-water-use relationships in forests, very little information is available. We analysed soil water uptake in 100 tree clusters differing in tree species diversity and species composition in the Hainich forest in central Germany. The clusters contained all possible combinations of five broadleaved tree species in one-, two- and three-species clusters (three diversity levels), replicated fourfold (20 one-species, 40 two-species and 40 three-species clusters). We estimated soil water uptake during a summer dry period in 0–0.3 m soil depth, based on throughfall and soil moisture measurements with a simple budgeting approach. Throughout the whole vegetation period in 2009, soil water uptake was additionally determined at a higher temporal resolution and also for a greater part of the soil profile (0–0.7 m) on a subset of 16 intensive clusters. During the dry spell, mean soil water uptake was 1.9 ± 0.1 mm day−1 in 0–0.3 m (100 clusters) and 3.0 ± 0.5 mm day−1 in 0–0.7 m soil depth (16 clusters), respectively. Besides a slightly higher water use of Fraxinus clusters, we could not detect any effects of species identity or diversity on cluster water use. We discuss that water use may indeed be a conservative process, that differences in tree-species-specific traits may be compensated for by other factors such as herb layer coverage and tree spatial arrangement, and that diversity-driven differences in water use may arise only at a larger scale. We further conclude that with respect to stand water use "tree diversity'' alone is not an appropriate simplification of the complex network of interactions between species traits, stand properties and environmental conditions that have varying influence on stand water use, both in space and time.

Highlights

  • Little information is available on the relationship between tree diversity and stand water use in temperate forests; but water use is most likely related to productivity in forest stands (Law et al, 2002)

  • Similar findings are supported by some field studies: a positive relationship between tree species diversity and productivity was indicated in early successional and disturbed sclerophyllous and conifer forests before canopy closure (Vilaet al., 2005)

  • With our 100-cluster approach and 400 measurement points overall, we tried to compensate for the lack of spatial resolution at the cost of a finer temporal resolution

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Little information is available on the relationship between tree diversity and stand water use in temperate forests; but water use is most likely related to productivity in forest stands (Law et al, 2002). Evidence for a positive relationship between productivity and tree species diversity in forests is accumulating, indicated by a modelling exercise of competitive interactions of randomly chosen species (Tilman et al, 1997). From a forest succession model dealing with “real” species, the conclusion was derived that “tree diversity strongly influences primary productivity in European temperate forests across a wide range of sites with different climates through a strong complementarity effect” (Morin et al, 2011). Similar findings are supported by some field studies: a positive relationship between tree species diversity and productivity was indicated in early successional and disturbed sclerophyllous and conifer forests before canopy closure (Vilaet al., 2005). On 12 000 permanent forest plots in Canada, a strong positive effect of biodiversity on tree productivity (controlled for environmental conditions)

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call