Abstract

The gut microbiota is recognised as an essential asset for the normal functioning of animal biology. When wild animals are moved into captivity, the modified environmental pressures are expected to rewire the gut microbiota, yet whether this transition follows similar patterns across vertebrates is still unresolved due to the absence of systematic multi-species analyses. We performed a meta-analysis of gut microbiota profiles of 322 captive and 322 wild specimens from 24 vertebrate species. Our analyses yielded no overall pattern of diversity and compositional variation between wild and captive vertebrates, but a heterogeneous landscape of responses, which differed depending on the components of diversity considered. Captive populations showed enrichment patterns of human-associated microorganisms, and the minimal host phylogenetic signal suggests that changes between wild and captive populations are mainly driven by case-specific captivity conditions. Finally, we show that microbiota differences between wild and captive populations can impact evolutionary and ecological inferences that rely on hierarchical clustering-based comparative analyses of gut microbial communities across species.

Highlights

  • The gut microbiota is recognised as an essential asset for the normal functioning of animal biology

  • We analysed whether the observed changes across vertebrates exhibited any host phylogenetic signal, and we contrasted the data to five theoretical scenarios relating to how the gut microbiota may vary when comparing wild and captive animals

  • Our study revealed that long-term captivity does not induce systematic directional changes of the diversity and composition of the gut microbiota in vertebrates

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The gut microbiota is recognised as an essential asset for the normal functioning of animal biology. We show that microbiota differences between wild and captive populations can impact evolutionary and ecological inferences that rely on hierarchical clustering-based comparative analyses of gut microbial communities across species. The level of distortion that the use of captive animals entails for such analyses is yet to be assessed To address these questions, we analysed the gut microbiota of comparable wild and long-term captive individuals belonging to 24 vertebrate species, including fish, amphibians, reptiles and mammals, and performed a meta-analysis of the diversity and compositional variation between wild and captive individuals. We analysed whether the observed changes across vertebrates exhibited any host phylogenetic signal, and we contrasted the data to five theoretical scenarios relating to how the gut microbiota may vary when comparing wild and captive animals. We assessed how ecological and evolutionary inferences can differ depending on the origin of the animal specimens employed to characterise gut microbial communities

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call