Abstract

481 Background: Several studies have evaluated the ethnic and gender diversity among editorial boards of academic journals in science and medicine, and revealed disparities among representation of historically underrepresented groups. However, the diversity among editorial boards in the field of genitourinary oncology remains unclear. Methods: Using the master journal list from Clarivate, we identified academic journals with a dedicated or primary focus in genitourinary cancers. We then identified the list of editorial board members on each journal’s website. We evaluated economic diversity based off each editor’s country of origin, and classified countries as high income based off World Bank listing for the 2024 fiscal year. We confirmed gender from each editor’s self-reported gender on his or her academic profile. Results: We identified 7 journals with a focus in genitourinary cancers. Among these journals, a total of 485 editor positions were identified, with 397 men (81.86%) and 80 women (16.49%). The gender of 8 individuals (1.65%) could not be confirmed. 28 editors (5.77%) were from countries not identified as high-income countries per World Bank criteria. Conclusions: There are disparities in country of origin among editors of genitourinary oncology journals, with a small proportion of editors originating from countries classified as middle- or low-income. [Table: see text]

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call