Abstract

In the rapidly growing literature on exploring urban restructuring in reference to the state rescaling, many authors have neglected the relatively fixed and immobile forms of territorial organization. The development of China’s National New Areas (NNAs) provides an opportunity to explore the hybrid and multiscalar processes of state rescaling. From the perspective of rescaling, an analytical framework was established to examine the practice of NNAs and their governance rescaling in China. Every National New Area (NNA) is the result of China’s “state spatial selectivity”, and the central government has guided policies to a specific spatial scale to cope with the development crisis. The rescaling of NNA governance is the process of the functioning of all-level administrative subjects in the functional orientation, spatial zoning, administrative system, and power allocation through rigid or flexible means. In practice, there are significant governance scale differences in territorial spatial organization, administrative systems, and power distribution among the various NNAs, which has led to diverse governance modes. The degree of coupling between the scale of new and existing administrative divisions is the key to the rescaling of NNA governance. Most NNAs are still facing the challenge of unifying their territorial development logic. Discussions of state rescaling in western countries have focused on the super-local level. The case of China clearly shows the role of local embeddedness and diversification in rescaling.

Highlights

  • Since the 1980s, influenced by globalization and neoliberalization [1], countries around the world have carried out different forms of state spatial restructuring to maintain and strengthen competitive regions [2,3]

  • In recent years, rescaling as a product of administrative restructuring, spatial production strategy, and regional restructuring has become an important perspective in the new regionalism concept when exploring globalization, regional spatial production, and regional governance, and many successes have been achieved [7,8,9,10]

  • State spatial selectivity theory originated from state rescaling processes that operated in different forms, ranging from regional management agency to soft regional planning and policy space [12,13]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Since the 1980s, influenced by globalization and neoliberalization [1], countries around the world have carried out different forms of state spatial restructuring to maintain and strengthen competitive regions [2,3]. Through strategic regional rescaling and “gradients” of differential institutional supply, state/local power acts over different spatial ranges, triggering the restructuring of spatial organizations and forms of governance at different scales to achieve exponential growth. This trend has resulted in a revival of regional research. The NNA governance structure has developed according to the rescaling projects, the process of restructuring, and the extent of government and social power at different scales, which has influenced the effectiveness of NNAs. Studies of the reallocation of state power in China have highlighted the unique characteristics and national background of the rescaling process [21]. This study investigated the local embedding characteristics and diversification of the rescaling of NNA governance in post-reform China.

Research Methodology
China’s NNAs
Temporal Characteristics of China’s NNAs
Spatial Characteristics of China’s NNAs
Reconstruction of Spatial Zoning
Reconstruction of the Administrative System
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call