Abstract
This article examines the transposition of the Cross-Border Patients’ Rights Directive 2011/24/EU (the Directive) in two systems of the European Union, Austria and Bulgaria. The specific purpose of the paper is to examine and explicate the transposition output in the two cases, from a resource perspective. In doing so, the piece studies the implications of the socioeconomic cleavage in the Union on the nature and contents of transposition texts in rich and poor systems. Healthcare sector resources’ impact on transposition is examined in detail. This factor is derived from the provisions of the Directive and identified as critical for the interpretation of the Directive in the context of the examined systems. The study’s findings establish a convergence between the two systems. In spite of divergent sector resources, transposition strategies in both cases followed a protectionist logic and served to restrict unlimited patient mobility, though to a different extent.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.