Abstract

Multiple ecological processes simultaneously govern community assembly, but it remains unclear how abiotic stressors regulate the relative importance of these processes among different biogeographic regions. Therefore, we conducted a comprehensive study on the responses of community assembly to varying environmental gradients, using the mean, variance, skewness, and kurtosis of plant height (height), specific leaf area (SLA) and leaf dry matter content (LDMC) distributions on the Tibetan Plateau (TP) and the Mongolian Plateau (MP). Our results showed that the prevalence of trait convergence across all grasslands in both TP and MP seem to be the result of abiotic filtering or weaker competitive exclusion etc. These trait-convergence assembly processes decrease the functional dispersion but increase the evenness of the trait frequency distribution. The mean, variance, skewness, and kurtosis responses of grassland communities to abiotic stress varied between the TP and MP. On average, plant trait distribution was mainly driven by temperature on the TP, and low-temperature stress altered the community assembly rules. In contrast, water availability shaped plant trait frequency distributions on the MP, and drought stress mediated the balance between different assembly processes. Our results provide empirical evidence that divergent abiotic stressors regulate the grassland community assembly on the TP and MP. Together, our study speculates that different aspects of future climate change, such as climate warming and changing precipitation patterns, on community assembly are dependent on regional climatic regimes.

Highlights

  • Elucidating the mechanisms and drivers of plant community assembly is a key challenge in ecology (Keddy, 1992; Vellend, 2010; Yao et al, 2021)

  • We address the following questions: (1) What is the relative importance of stochastic and deterministic processes in these two regions? (2) Does the response of trait frequency distribution to abiotic stressors differ between the two regions? (3) What are the foremost abiotic stressors regulating community assembly processes in two regions?

  • The responses of the four moments of height, specific leaf area (SLA), and leaf dry matter content (LDMC) distributions to temperature stress and water availability differed between the Tibetan Plateau (TP) and Mongolian Plateau (MP) (Figure 2, Supplementary Figures 3–6, and Supplementary Tables 1–3)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Elucidating the mechanisms and drivers of plant community assembly is a key challenge in ecology (Keddy, 1992; Vellend, 2010; Yao et al, 2021). Many studies suggest that the traditional taxon-based approach is unable to adequately describe the influence of climate on plant community assembly processes (McGill et al, 2006; Götzenberger et al, 2012; Purschke et al, 2013; Cadotte and Tucker, 2017). Response of Community Assembly to Abiotic Stressors plant communities along environmental gradients exhibit distinct functional trait frequency distributions (Wieczynski et al, 2019; Liu et al, 2020), and the shifts in trait distributions are linked to community assembly processes and their responses to climate change (Enquist et al, 2015). Neutral theory posits that all individuals in a community are ecologically equivalent, and stochastic processes produce a random local trait frequency distribution (Cadotte and Tucker, 2017; Perronne et al, 2017). Exploring the influence of the underlying processes on trait distribution may provide new insights into community assembly mechanisms

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call