Abstract
Genitalia appear to evolve rapidly and divergently in taxa with internal fertilization. The current consensus is that intense directional sexual selection drives the rapid evolution of genitalia. Recent research on the millipede Antichiropus variabilis suggests that the male genitalia are currently experiencing stabilizing selection – a pattern of selection expected for lock-and-key structures that enforce mate recognition and reproductive isolation. Here, we investigate how divergence in genital morphology affects reproductive compatibility among isolated populations of A. variabilis. Females from a focal population were mated first to a male from their own population and, second, to a male from one of two populations with divergent genital morphology. We observed variation in mating behavior that might indicate the emergence of precopulatory reproductive barriers: males from one divergent population took significantly longer to recognize females and exhibited mechanical difficulty in genital insertion. Moreover, we observed very low paternity success for extra-population males who were successful in copulating. Our data suggest that divergence in genital shape may be contributing to reproductive isolation, and incipient speciation among isolated populations of A. variabilis.
Highlights
Species-rich taxa usually display significant divergence in traits related to reproduction (Darwin 1871)
As with other sexual traits, it is thought that intense directional sexual selection drives the rapid evolution of divergent genitalia among isolated populations (Eberhard 1985, 2009, 2010; Arnqvist 1997, 1998; Sirot 2003; Hosken and Stockley 2004), potentially leading to an increased frequency of speciation (Arnqvist 1998; Panhuis et al 2001)
This study has explored how divergence in male genitalia may contribute to reproductive isolation and incipient speciation among isolated populations of the millipede A. variabilis
Summary
Species-rich taxa usually display significant divergence in traits related to reproduction (Darwin 1871). The classic hypothesis for genital evolution posits that genitalia function as “lock-and-key” structures, which are subject to stabilizing selection, enforcing mate recognition and species isolation (Dufour 1844; Shapiro and Porter 1989; Arnqvist 1997; Hosken and Stockley 2004). These processes need not be mutually exclusive. Species may go through periods of continuous directional evolution, punctuated by periods of stabilizing selection in which incipient species are reproductively isolated by the products of past directional selection
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.