Abstract
IntroductionDespite increases in availability, potency, and consumption of cannabis, epidemiological data suggest decreases in prevalence of cannabis use disorder (CUD) in some groups. Understanding mechanisms for these changes may help improve diagnostic tools for identifying disordered use. This analysis evaluates changes in CUD compared to a substance with comparably stable social and environmental context (alcohol use disorder [AUD]) as well as treatment engagement and need from 2002 to 2019. MethodsData were from the National Survey on Drug Use and Health. Outcomes included CUD and AUD symptoms, treatment engagement, and perceived need. Temporal trends and average annual rate of change [AARC] were computed. ResultsBetween 2002 and 2019, daily cannabis use prevalence increased by 94% (AARC=11.68%), whereas CUD prevalence among those using cannabis daily reduced by 47.9% (AARC=-10.30%). Daily alcohol use prevalence decreased by 10.86% (AARC=-1.90%), and AUD prevalence among those using alcohol daily reduced by 3.9% (AARC=-0.67%). Prevalence of individual 12-month CUD criteria among those using cannabis daily decreased (-13.4 to -59.6% change; AARC = -2.4% to -14%). Among those using cannabis daily, trends in prevalence of individual AUD criteria varied, with some criteria increasing in prevalence and others decreasing (-30.2% to 24.6% change; AARC = -5.82% to 3.7%). Treatment engagement and perceived need reduced for cannabis, whereas treatment engagement increased and perceived need decreased for alcohol. ConclusionThese results suggest that CUD and AUD criteria may be determined within the cultural context dictating the definition of harm which has changed for cannabis, but not alcohol, from 2002-2019.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.