Abstract

The amphicarpic annual legume Amphicarpaea bracteata is unusual in producing aerial and subterranean cleistogamous flowers that always self‐fertilize and, less commonly, aerial chasmogamous flowers that outcross. Although both morphologic and genetic variants are known in this highly selfing species, debate continues over whether this variation is continuous, reflecting the segregation of standing genetic variation, or discontinuous, reflecting distinct taxa that rarely intercross. We characterized SNP variation in 128 individuals in southern Wisconsin to assess within‐ and among‐population variation at 3928 SNPs. We also assessed genotype and leaf morphology in an additional 76 individuals to connect phenotypic variation with genetic variation. Genetic variation maps onto three strongly divergent and highly inbred genetic groups showing little relation to site location. Each group has a distinct phenotype, but the divergence of these groups differs from the varietal divisions previously identified based on morphological characters. Like previous authors, we argue that the taxonomy of this species should be revised. Despite extensive sympatry, estimates of among‐group migration rates are low, and hybrid individuals were at low frequency (<2%) in our dataset. Restricted gene flow likely results from high selfing rates and partial reproductive incompatibility as evidenced by the U‐shaped distribution of pairwise F ST values reflecting “islands” of genomic divergence. These islands may be associated with hybrid incompatibility loci that arose in allopatry. The coexistence of lineages within sites may reflect density‐dependent attack by species‐specific strains of pathogenic fungi and/or root‐nodulating bacteria specializing on distinct genotypes.

Highlights

  • The rapid development of accessible molecular genotyping and sequencing methods has greatly improved our ability to catalog biodiversity (Bickford et al 2007)

  • These genetic incompatibilities result in reduced hybrid fitness through a variety of mechanisms, including Bateson–Dobzhansky–Muller incompatibilities, and structural differences such as inversions or translocations that interfere with meiosis in hybrids

  • Our goals are to use high-resolution genomic data to (1) examine differences among the three lineages at many more loci than previously studied, (2) use such data to assess the extent of gene flow and potential reproductive isolation between lineages, and (3) assess correlations between genetic and phenotypic data to clarify the nature of the variants and the extent to which morphology supports the recognition of cryptic species within the Amphicarpaea bracteata complex

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The rapid development of accessible molecular genotyping and sequencing methods has greatly improved our ability to catalog biodiversity (Bickford et al 2007). Populations diverging via genetic drift can accumulate genetic incompatibilities and give rise to reproductively isolated cryptic species independent of natural selection (Nei and Nozawa 2011) These genetic incompatibilities result in reduced hybrid fitness through a variety of mechanisms, including Bateson–Dobzhansky–Muller incompatibilities (fixation of different alleles in different populations at multiple loci that lead to abnormalities when recombined in hybrids), and structural differences such as inversions or translocations that interfere with meiosis in hybrids. These hybrid incompatibilities are “intrinsic” in that low fitness results from genomic factors rather than maladaptation to parental habitats (Burke and Arnold 2001; Baack et al 2015). The acquisition of these intrinsic hybrid incompatibilities proceeds with particular efficiency in small and highly inbreeding populations due to the enhanced effects of drift when effective population sizes are small (Grundt et al 2006; Skrede et al 2008; Gustafsson et al 2014)

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.