Abstract
The differentiation between significant mechanical obstruction and nonobstructive dilation of the kidneys and ureters is fundamental to patient management. The diuretic renal scan is a useful test in this situation because it usually is reliable and reproducible and is noninvasive and objective, providing information about the function of each kidney. However, this study has given variable results in a small number of patients. We report our experience with five such patients and recommend an algorithm for evaluating patients with equivocal scan results. This report emphasizes the importance of continued follow-up and the need for periodic reevaluation of patients with unexplained urinary symptoms or persistent flank pain, even when the initial diuretic renal scan is normal.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.