Abstract

Health management information systems (HMIS) produce large amounts of data about health service provision and population health, and provide opportunities for data-based decision-making in decentralized health systems. Yet the data are little-used locally. A well-defined approach to district-level decision-making using health data would help better meet the needs of the local population. In this second of four papers on district decision-making for health in low-income settings, our aim was to explore ways in which district administrators and health managers in low- and lower-middle-income countries use health data to make decisions, to describe the decision-making tools they used and identify challenges encountered when using these tools. A systematic literature review, following PRISMA guidelines, was undertaken. Experts were consulted about key sources of information. A search strategy was developed for 14 online databases of peer reviewed and grey literature. The resources were screened independently by two reviewers using pre-defined inclusion criteria. The 14 papers included were assessed for the quality of reported evidence and a descriptive evidence synthesis of the review findings was undertaken. We found 12 examples of tools to assist district-level decision-making, all of which included two key stages—identification of priorities, and development of an action plan to address them. Of those tools with more steps, four included steps to review or monitor the action plan agreed, suggesting the use of HMIS data. In eight papers HMIS data were used for prioritization. Challenges to decision-making processes fell into three main categories: the availability and quality of health and health facility data; human dynamics and financial constraints. Our findings suggest that evidence is available about a limited range of processes that include the use of data for decision-making at district level. Standardization and pre-testing in diverse settings would increase the potential that these tools could be used more widely.

Highlights

  • Health management information systems (HMIS) produce data about health service provision and population health status that are intended to be used for decision-making and planning at all levels of the health system, especially in the local area where they have been generated

  • Our findings suggest that evidence is available about a limited range of processes that include the use of data for decision-making at district level

  • Examples from research studies to encourage the use of local health data at community level include: a randomized field experiment in Uganda to encourage community monitoring of health services, in which the community used health data to hold their local health workers to account for performance, leading to greater utilization of health services and improved health outcomes (Bjorkman and Svensson 2009); and a participatory approach to community assessment and planning for maternal and child health programmes in Ethiopia, which resulted in health data and community priorities being used to decide health care activities (Bhattacharyya and Murray 2000)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Health management information systems (HMIS) produce data about health service provision and population health status that are intended to be used for decision-making and planning at all levels of the health system, especially in the local area where they have been generated. When considering information use in organizations, Feldman and March (1981) identified wider impediments to using data rationally for decision-making, which might be applied to the field of health administration. These are based on users’ perceptions that the data are inadequate or irrelevant, because the data gathers and users are two distinct groups; the data have been collected for a different purpose, e.g. for monitoring rather than decision-making; the data are subject to strategic misrepresentation; or that using data as a symbol of rational decision-making takes on more significance than the outcome of the process

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call