Abstract

The ability of statistical models to accurately characterize distributional characteristics such as skewness and kurtosis can impact the results of statistical analysis. This article compares the feasible skewness–kurtosis spaces for two generalizations of the lognormal, the inverse hyperbolic sine (IHS) and g-and-h probability density functions (pdf’s), each of which can accommodate a wide variety of distributional characteristics. For h ≥ 0, the boundary of the skewness–kurtosis spaces for g-and-h and IHS coincides with that of a generalized (three-parameter) lognormal (LN*) distribution. The increased skewness–kurtosis flexibility of the g-and-h distribution, for h < 0, relative to the IHS is obtained by introducing vertical asymptotes, compact support, and possibly U-shaped pdf’s. This increased coverage, however, may not be helpful if the data are unimodal. Empirical daily, weekly, and monthly stock return data are used to compare the descriptive ability of the IHS, g-and-h, and LN* distributions.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.