Abstract

Abstract. Modeling and monitoring plankton functional types (PFTs) is challenged by the insufficient amount of field measurements of ground truths in both plankton models and bio-optical algorithms. In this study, we combine remote sensing data and a dynamic plankton model to simulate an ecologically sound spatial and temporal distribution of phyto-PFTs. We apply an innovative ecological indicator approach to modeling PFTs and focus on resolving the question of diatom–coccolithophore coexistence in the subpolar high-nitrate and low-chlorophyll regions. We choose an artificial neural network as our modeling framework because it has the potential to interpret complex nonlinear interactions governing complex adaptive systems, of which marine ecosystems are a prime example. Using ecological indicators that fulfill the criteria of measurability, sensitivity and specificity, we demonstrate that our diagnostic model correctly interprets some basic ecological rules similar to ones emerging from dynamic models. Our time series highlight a dynamic phyto-PFT community composition in all high-latitude areas and indicate seasonal coexistence of diatoms and coccolithophores. This observation, though consistent with in situ and remote sensing measurements, has so far not been captured by state-of-the-art dynamic models, which struggle to resolve this "paradox of the plankton". We conclude that an ecological indicator approach is useful for ecological modeling of phytoplankton and potentially higher trophic levels. Finally, we speculate that it could serve as a powerful tool in advancing ecosystem-based management of marine resources.

Highlights

  • We are yet to obtain a consistent and complete view of the global biogeography of plankton functional types (PFTs), groups of organisms composed of many different species identified by a common biogeochemical function rather than a common phylogeny

  • Which interactions are linear and which nonlinear? How do the interpretations vary across PFTs? Does the model capture the same relationships that are described mathematically by the NASA Ocean Biogeochemical Model (NOBM) that was used to train it? How are the weights distributed among the interactions?

  • HighLat regime is characterized by relatively lower sea surface temperature (SST) and lower photosynthetically available radiation (PAR) but higher wind speed (Wspd) and Chl compared to the LowLat regime

Read more

Summary

Introduction

We are yet to obtain a consistent and complete view of the global biogeography of plankton functional types (PFTs), groups of organisms composed of many different species identified by a common biogeochemical function rather than a common phylogeny. In order to enable projection of past and future phyto-PFT states, as well as their potential application in ecosystem management of marine resources (Palacz, 2012), we select ecological indicators that fulfill the criteria of indicators of good environmental status (GES) (Commission, 2008) These criteria, described by Link et al (2010), include (i) measurability – the availability of data to estimate the indicator, (ii) sensitivity – the ability to detect change in an ecosystem, and (iii) specificity – the ability to link the said change in an indicator as a response to a known intervention or pressure. ANNs based on ecological indicators have been used to simulate the distribution of pCO2 in the North Atlantic (Telszewski et al, 2009) and to compare patterns of biological production in eastern boundary upwelling regions (Lachkar and Gruber, 2012) In contrast to these earlier studies, we attempt to use only ecological indicators to simultaneously model biomass distribution of four phyto-PFTs in key biogeochemical provinces, including the open-ocean HNLC regions. – improve the existing model estimates of monthly climatology and time series distribution of diatoms and coccolithophores in the HNLC regions

Source of indicators
Source of phyto-PFTs
Spatial and temporal domains
PhytoANN training and evaluation
Ecological niches of PFTs
Annual average phytoplankton community composition
Seasonal succession of phyto-PFTs
Dramatic shifts in phyto-PFT distribution
Assessment of model limitations
Implications
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call