Distribution of magma beneath the East Pacific Rise near the 9°03′N overlapping spreading center from forward modeling of common depth point data

Abstract

We have reprocessed six cross‐axis and three along‐axis common depth point (CDP) profiles near the 9°03′N overlapping spreading center (OSC) to understand the relationship between axial magma chamber (AMC) width and seafloor morphology. Travel time modeling of the AMC reflector reveals an asymmetric distribution of melt across the 9°03′N OSC. The variation of modeled AMC width beneath either OSC limb is minimal, but the width increases nearly fourfold across the offset attaining an estimated maximum width of 4.15 km near the 9°17′N ridge axis discontinuity. Additionally, melt distribution underlying the eastern rise limb is not symmetric with respect to the rise axis/neovolcanic zone but is displaced toward the western rise flank. Depth migration, based on a continuum velocity model consistent with postcritical reflections from the base of layer 2A, places the skewed AMC reflector beneath a nearly constant thickness sheeted dike section which dips ∼ 10° away from the rise axis. To confirm AMC continuity beneath the western rise flank, we use the Maslov synthetic seismogram method to show that amplitude enhancement of the AMC reflector is consistent with a continuous melt body underlying a thickening extrusive layer. Analysis of along‐strike CDP profiles indicates an AMC which is neither overlapping nor discontinuous when projected onto the along‐strike plane. Identifying intracrustal events on along‐axis CDP lines, however, requires extreme caution; we have modeled out‐of‐plane scattering using a Kirchhoff formulation, and we show that a coherent event identified beneath the overlap basin results from diffraction off the AMC which lies nearly 3 km to the west of the profile. We attribute the asymmetric pattern of melt to a decoupling of melt supply from preexisting weaknesses in the brittle upper crust. In this model, melt ascends upward (buoyancy forces) until deflected by the impermeable sheeted dike complex; melt then migrates updip, beneath the base of the sheeted dikes, toward the neovplcanic zone where fissuring produces a temporary conduit for emplacement. Discrete jumps in modeled AMC width toward the overlap basin represent a further displacement/defocusing of melt supply (western AMC edge) relative to the neovolcanic zone (eastern AMC edge). The asymmetric pattern of melt therefore represents a gradual, en‐echelon accommodation of melt supply across the 9 km of ridge axis offset at 9°03′N. Thus for asymmetric configurations, AMC width may not correlate solely with magmatic robustness but may signify the amount of decoupling which exists between melt supply and extrusive emplacement within the neovolcanic zone. Here we present a new model for OSC development which invokes a significant component of cross‐axis melt migration. Moreover, abrupt changes in AMC width near ridge axis discontinuities (e.g., 9°17′N deviation in axial linearity) suggest that any along‐axis melt migration is confined to subsegments of the ridge and seem to preclude the segment length migration of melt proposed in some current models. The transition of melt supply beneath the overlap basin might favor a continuous low‐velocity zone underlying this feature; if true, basin development may be related to the subsidence of a mechanically weak crustal lid. The proposed model for OSC development therefore views ridge axis discontinuities as the surficial response of misalignment and/or defocusing of melt supply in the uppermost mantle.