Abstract

In this study, we evaluated if railway embankments and road verges create refuge habitats for bee flora across agricultural landscape. The survey was conducted in 2009–2012, in the Lublin Province, SE Poland. Data on the bee forage flora were obtained while making floristic charts along 60 transect plots × 300 m, with a total length of 18 000 m, for each type of linear structure. Forage bee flora was compared with respect to species richness, diversity, and evenness indices. The canonical correspondence analysis (CCA) was used to characterize relationship between species composition and environmental variables. The bee forage species richness and abundance were significantly greater on railway embankments than on road verges. The composition of species varied considerably; the number of bee forage species common to both habitats was only approximately 38% in entire data set. Most good-value bee forage species were recorded along the embankments of railways with an intermediate traffic volume. Bee forage species diversity benefits from the location of habitat elements (forests or meadows), primarily if the distance is <50 m. The lack of dense patches of valuable bee forage species in the road verges was related to the high density of non-nectariferous graminoids. Our results demonstrate how the value of man-made areas in an agricultural ecosystem can vary with respect to floral resources across the landscape, suggesting that it is inappropriate to generalize about agricultural systems as a whole without first addressing differences among habitats.

Highlights

  • The loss of pollinators worldwide represents a potential danger for ecosystems and human health [1]

  • Almost 71.5% more bee forage species were recorded on the railway embankments (307 species) compared to the road verges (179 species)

  • The location of the linear structures in relation to habitat elements in the landscape affected the richness of bee forage species only on the railway embankments (Kruskal−Wallis test for the habitat effect: H = 7.95, p = 0.018), but not on the road verges (H = 2.95, p = 0.318; Tab. 1)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The loss of pollinators worldwide represents a potential danger for ecosystems and human health [1]. The possible causes of the pollinator decline are multifactorial These include (i) intensive farming with use of chemicals, (ii) diseases and parasites, (iii) climate change, (vi) monocultures with the dominance (>70%) of cereals, (iv) spread of invasive species, (v) habitat loss, (vi) simplification of the agricultural landscape structure, and (vii) disappearance of multi-flowering patches [1,5]. This can result in monotonous diet and a chronic scarcity of nutrition for pollinators [6,7]

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call