Abstract

This article explores the practices of selecting news images that depict death at a global picture agency, national picture agency and a news magazine. The study is based on ethnographic observations and interviews ( N = 30) from three Western-based news organisations, each representing a link in the complex international news-image circulation process. Further, the organisations form an example of a chain of filters through which most of the news images produced for the global market have to pass before publication. These filters are scrutinised by the empirical case studies that examine the professionals’ ethical reasoning regarding images of violence and death. This research contributes to an understanding of the differences and similarities between media organisations as filters and sheds light on their role in shaping visual coverage. This study concludes that photojournalism professionals’ ethical decision-making is discursively constructed around three frames: (1) shared ethics, (2) relative ethics and (3) distributed ethics. All the organisations share certain similar conceptions of journalism ethics at the level of ideals. On the level of workplace practices and routines, a mixture of practical preconditions, journalism’s self-regulation, business logic and national legislation lead to differences in the image selection practices. It is argued that the ethical decision-making is distributed between – and sometimes even outsourced to – colleagues working in different parts of the filtering chain. Finally, this study suggests that dead or suffering bodies are often invisible in the images of the studied media organisations.

Highlights

  • Natural catastrophes, wars and conflicts are events of human suffering that are regularly covered by the media

  • Wars and conflicts are events of human suffering that are regularly covered by the media. The way these events are represented to citizens is largely dependent on media organisations, who act as gatekeepers for visual coverage

  • This study explores the ethical reasoning of photojournalism professionals from three media organisations with respect to images of violent death

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Wars and conflicts are events of human suffering that are regularly covered by the media. The ‘Black Lives Matter’ movement has been spreading its message against racial discrimination and violence again since May 2020, after the death of George Floyd In this case, the social media images and videos posted by ordinary citizens, activists and others helped elevate the topic to become a part of the global news agenda and mobilise people to protest. According to McKinley and Fahmy (2011), the public can handle more shocking images than before because of their increased exposure to graphic material through online forums This development has created emergent ethical dilemmas for the gatekeeping processes in media organisations. Media professionals cannot ignore social media visibility, but they need to act according to the journalistic values, such as objectivity and truth-telling, that are crucial when it comes to graphic images (see Nilsson, 2020: 271)

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call