Abstract

In this paper, we investigate the design of distributed damping systems (DDSs) for the overall seismic protection of multiple adjacent buildings. The considered DDSs contain interstory dampers implemented inside the buildings and also interbuilding damping links. The design objectives include mitigating the buildings seismic response by reducing the interstory-drift and story-acceleration peak-values and producing small interbuilding approachings to decrease the risk of interbuilding collisions. Designing high-performance DDS configurations requires determining convenient damper positions and computing proper values for the damper parameters. That allocation-tuning optimization problem can pose serious computational difficulties for large-scale multibuilding systems. The design methodology proposed in this work—(i) is based on an effective matrix formulation of the damped multibuilding system; (ii) follows an H ∞ approach to define an objective function with fast-evaluation characteristics; (iii) exploits the computational advantages of the current state-of-the-art genetic algorithm solvers, including the usage of hybrid discrete-continuous optimization and parallel computing; and (iv) allows setting actuation schemes of particular interest such as full-linked configurations or nonactuated buildings. To illustrate the main features of the presented methodology, we consider a system of five adjacent multistory buildings and design three full-linked DDS configurations with a different number of actuated buildings. The obtained results confirm the flexibility and effectiveness of the proposed design approach and demonstrate the high-performance characteristics of the devised DDS configurations.

Highlights

  • Over the last few years, an increasing research effort has been invested in the analysis, design and implementation of distributed damping systems (DDSs) for seismic protection of buildings and civil structures [1,2]

  • The combined allocation-tuning problem can be formulated as a constrained optimization problem, with a set of decision variables that describes the different allocation schemes and parameter values of the damping devices, an objective function that allows evaluating the suitability of the corresponding DDSs, and a system of constraints that incorporate relevant features of the considered technical setup

  • It should be highlighted that solving allocation-tuning optimization problems (ATOPs) for large structural systems can be a hard computational task, due to a number of factors such as high dimensionality, the combination of discrete and continuous decision variables, the presence of complex structural constraints, and the computational cost associated to the evaluation of the objective function

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Over the last few years, an increasing research effort has been invested in the analysis, design and implementation of distributed damping systems (DDSs) for seismic protection of buildings and civil structures [1,2]. The combined allocation-tuning problem can be formulated as a constrained optimization problem, with a set of decision variables that describes the different allocation schemes and parameter values of the damping devices, an objective function that allows evaluating the suitability of the corresponding DDSs, and a system of constraints that incorporate relevant features of the considered technical setup. The relevance of linked configurations lies in the fact that they can help to mitigate the vibrational response of nonactuated buildings and can provide an effective protection against interbuilding impacts (pounding) [22,23] To incorporate those aspects in the DDS design and reducing the number of optimization variables, we introduce the schemes of allowed damper positions, which specify the interstory and interbuilding locations where the dampers can be implemented. For example, nj will denote the number of interstory dampers in building B ( j) , the number of interbuilding dampers between buildings B ( j) and B ( j+1) will be indicated by ñ j , and the overall number of degrees of freedom in the MBS will be represented by n

Mathematical Model
Plain Building Model
Interstory and Interbuilding Damping Models
Overall Multibuilding Model
State-Space Model and Output Variables
Optimization Procedure
Optimization Variables and Associated Multibuilding Model
Objective Function and Optimization Constraints
DDS Designs
Seismic Responses
Findings
Conclusions
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.