Abstract

We contrast in this article the system demands imposed by brute force, complete replanning, and a new, goal-directed approach called dynamic plan revision (DPR). One of the two processes must be invoked when some aspects of the environment change and currently existing plans are likely to fail. Complete replanning is conceptually simpler but requires significantly more computation because it reproduces also those plan steps that have not been affected by the changes. DPR attempts to minimize the scope of replanning and makes to the current plans as small amount of modification as possible. the more rapidly the environment changes, the less practical complete replanning becomes. the issue is even more significant with time-critical applications DPR uses goal hierarchies produced at the same time when plans are generated. the planning systems has an “active attitude” toward the feedback from the environment and takes advantage of all information becoming available during plan execution. We have also developed and implemented a distributed version of this approach in the domain of Distributed Manufacturing Operations [N. V. Findler and J. Gao, Data and Know. Eng., 2, 285–301 (1987); Q. Ge and N. V. Findler, Proc. Austr. Joint Conf. on Art. Int., 439–455 (1988); N. Y. Findler and G. Ge, Int. J. Intell. Syst., 4, 459–470 (1989)]. the relevant algorithms are given in the Appendices A and B. © 1994 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.