Abstract

BackgroundThe attentional blink (AB) refers to an impairment in detecting the second of two target stimuli presented in close succession in a rapid stream of distractors. Recent studies indicate that the AB results, in part, from distractor suppression mechanisms, that may be mediated by striatal dopamine. Yet, it is currently unclear how distractor suppression ability may contribute to the AB. Here, we examined whether distractor suppression ability is predictive of an individual's AB depth and/or recovery. In addition, we investigated the relationship between individual spontaneous eye blink rate (sEBR), a marker of striatal dopaminergic functioning, and AB performance.Methodology/Principal findingsSubjects were presented with rapid streams of letters containing white distractors, a red T1 and a green T2. T2 was presented either at Lag2, Lag4 or Lag10, and preceded by a distractor that shared the same identity as T2 (T2 primed) or not (T2 not primed). Replicating previous work [1], we found that slow AB recovery (poor T2 performance in Lag4 vs. Lag10) was associated with a failure to inhibit distractors, as indexed by greater positive priming. However, no relationship was observed between a subject's ability to suppress distractors and AB depth (Lag10 vs. Lag2). Moreover, no relationship between sEBR and AB performance was observed.Results/SignificanceThese results indicate that a failure to inhibit distracting information impairs AB recovery, possibly by interfering with target encoding in working memory - but does not affect AB magnitude. The absence of a relationship between individual sEBR and AB performance may be explained by task specifics.

Highlights

  • In an ever-changing world, our senses are continuously bombarded with more information than our brain can process up to the level of awareness

  • Many models have been proposed to explain this deficit in target processing, with some attributing the attentional blink (AB) to T1-induced depletion of limited processing resources critical for consolidating a stimulus in working memory, and others explaining the AB in terms of dysfunctional gating of information to working memory rather than a capacity limitation of working memory

  • The second aim of this study was to further our understanding of the relationship between striatal dopamine and the AB

Read more

Summary

Introduction

In an ever-changing world, our senses are continuously bombarded with more information than our brain can process up to the level of awareness. The challenge our brain faces when presented with an overwhelming amount of information to analyze is well captured by one of the most studied attentional phenomena in the literature: the so-called attentional blink deficit [2]. This deficit occurs when people have to detect two target stimuli (T1 and T2) presented in close temporal succession in a rapid (,10 Hz) stream of distracter events. Recent studies indicate that the AB results, in part, from distractor suppression mechanisms, that may be mediated by striatal dopamine It is currently unclear how distractor suppression ability may contribute to the AB. We investigated the relationship between individual spontaneous eye blink rate (sEBR), a marker of striatal dopaminergic functioning, and AB performance

Objectives
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call