Abstract

Distraction is a major causal factor of road crashes, and very young and older drivers seem to be particularly susceptible to distracting stimuli; however, the possibilities of exploring the causes for increased distractibility of these groups in real traffic seem to be limited. Experiments in a driving simulator are a good choice to eliminate the risk for crashes and to present highly standardized stimulus combinations. In the present study, 72 subjects from four age groups completed a driving task that required occasional responses to the brake lights of a car in front. In addition, in certain experimental conditions, subjects had to respond to distracting visual or auditory stimuli. In addition to behavioral data, electrophysiological correlates of stimulus processing were derived from the electroencephalogram (EEG). In the two older groups, braking response times increased even in a simple task condition when visual distraction stimuli occurred. In more complex task conditions braking response times increased with acoustic and visual distractors in the middle-aged group as well. In these complex task conditions braking error rates, especially the missing of braking reaction in favor of the distracting task, increased under visual distraction with increasing age. Associated with this, a reduced P3b component in the event-related potential indicated an unfavorable allocation of mental resources. The study demonstrates the potential of driving simulators for studying effects of distraction, but also their limitations with respect to the interpretability of the results.

Highlights

  • IntroductionPublisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations

  • Post-hoc tests revealed different effects of additional distracting stimuli depending on task complexity: In the perception-only task there was a decrease of braking reaction times (RTs) in trials with acoustic and visual distracting stimuli in the two younger groups

  • The same effect was observed in the middle-aged and young-old group in the inhibition task (middle-aged: +89 ms/+94 ms; young-old: +160 ms/ + 162 ms; all p < 0.001), while the braking RTs of the young and oldest group differed significantly between acoustic and visual distractor stimuli: In the young group, braking RTs increased from single brake light to brake light with visual distraction and to acoustic distraction, whereas the braking RTs of the old-old group increased from single brake light to brake light with acoustic to brake light with visual distraction

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. Distraction is one of the greatest risk factors for road crashes. According to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), in 2018, 8% of all fatal crashes and 14% of all police-known traffic crashes in the USA were caused by distraction [1]. In view of the difficulty to identify distraction-related crashes and according to a study showing that drivers may be distracted for more than half the driving time [2], it can be assumed that the actual number of distraction-related crashes is even much higher

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call