Distinguishing true from pseudo hematoma in the cervical spinal canal using post-mortem computed tomography

Abstract

Spinal cord injury is difficult to detect directly on postmortem computed tomography (PMCT) and it is usually diagnosed by indirect findings such as a hematoma in the spinal canal. However, we have encountered cases where the hematoma-like high-attenuation area in the cervical spinal canal was visible on PMCT, while no hematoma was observed at autopsy; we called it a “pseudo hematoma in the cervical spinal canal (pseudo-HCSC).” In this retrospective study, we performed statistical analysis to distinguish true from pseudo-HCSC. The cervical spinal canal was dissected in 35 autopsy cases with a hematoma-like high-attenuation area (CT values 60-100 Hounsfield Unit (HU)) in the spinal canal from the first to the fourth cervical vertebrae in axial slices of PMCT images. Of these 22 had a hematoma and 13 did not (pseudo-HCSC). The location and length of the hematoma-like high-attenuation and spinal cord areas were assessed on reconstructed PMCT images, true HCSC cases had longer the posterior hematoma-like area and shorter the spinal cord area in the midline of the spinal canal (P < 0.05). Furthermore, we found that true HCSC cases were more likely to have fractures and gases on PMCT while pseudo-HCSC cases were more likely to have significant facial congestion (P < 0.05). We suggest that pseudo-HCSC on PMCT is related to congestion of the internal vertebral venous plexus. This study raises awareness about the importance of distinguishing true HCSC from pseudo-HCSC in PMCT diagnosis, and it also presents methods for differentiation between these two groups.