Abstract

Sepsis is one of the well-established diseases with specific patterns of neutrophil dysfunctions. Previous studies demonstrated sepsis-related neutrophil dysfunctions in comparison with subjects without infection. Since sepsis and infection are recently recognized as distinctive processes, whether these neutrophil dysfunctions are associated with sepsis or infection are not known. Therefore, we longitudinally compared neutrophil functions, widely-cited as exhibiting sepsis-related changes, between patients with septic shock and infection. The surface level of cluster of differentiation 64 (CD64), C-C motif chemokine receptor 2 (CCR2), C-X-C motif chemokine receptor 2 (CXCR2); apoptosis; and NETosis were measured from peripheral blood neutrophils for seven consecutive days using flow cytometry. The between-group comparisons of neutrophil functions were made both on a day-by-day basis and as linear regression between time and measured neutrophil functions (sepsis status included as model predictors). Our study found that, among neutrophil functions studied, only CXCR2 surface level is associated with sepsis. At disease onset, CXCR2 level decrease, with a dose-response relationship with clinical severity. Its level reverts to resemble infected patients by the end of the week. The relationship between CD64 surface level, CCR2 surface level, NETosis, and sepsis are mediated through the effect of infection. Apoptosis activity between these groups are similar, hence, not sepsis-related.

Highlights

  • Sepsis is a syndrome diagnosed by the presence of life-threatening organ dysfunctions triggered by infection [1]; not all patients with infection develop sepsis

  • We did not recruit sepsis patients without septic shock because their clinical signs often overlap with other conditions; which potentially lead to misclassification

  • All patients with septic shock were admitted to a medical intensive care unit while patients with infection were admitted to general medical wards. quick SOFA (qSOFA) score was monitored regularly for patients with infection to ensure their non-sepsis status throughout the study period

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Sepsis is a syndrome diagnosed by the presence of life-threatening organ dysfunctions triggered by infection [1]; not all patients with infection develop sepsis. Previous studies consistently identified specific alterations of neutrophil function in sepsis patients [3,4,5]; some of them were linked to poor clinical outcomes [6, 7]. Some knowledge gaps limit a clinical application of these sepsis-related neutrophil dysfunctions. With an update of sepsis definition by the Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic shock (Sepsis-3) [1], neutrophil dysfunctions defined on the background of previous clinical definition may not be relevant to the current practice. The paucity of longitudinal studies in this field makes it difficult to generalize the neutrophil dysfunctions demonstrated during one period to another during the clinical course

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call