Abstract

Limited information is available on whether blaKPC-containing plasmids from isolates in a hospital outbreak can be differentiated from epidemiologically unrelated blaKPC-containing plasmids based on sequence data. This study aimed to evaluate the performance of three approaches to distinguish epidemiologically related from unrelated blaKPC-containing pKpQiL-like IncFII(k2)-IncFIB(pQiL) plasmids. Epidemiologically related isolates were subjected to short- and long-read whole-genome sequencing. A hybrid assembly was performed, and plasmid sequences were extracted from the assembly graph. Epidemiologically unrelated plasmid sequences were extracted from GenBank. Pairwise comparisons of epidemiologically related and unrelated plasmids based on SNPs using snippy and of phylogenetic distance using Roary and using a similarity index that penalizes size differences between plasmids (Stoesser index) were performed. The percentage of pairwise comparisons misclassified as genetically related or as clonally unrelated was determined using different genetic thresholds for genetic relatedness. The ranges of number of SNPs, Roary phylogenetic distance, and Stoesser index overlapped between the epidemiologically related and unrelated plasmids. When a genetic similarity threshold that classified 100% of epidemiologically related plasmid pairs as genetically related was used, the percentages of plasmids misclassified as epidemiologically related ranged from 6.7% (Roary) to 20.8% (Stoesser index). Although epidemiologically related plasmids can be distinguished from unrelated plasmids based on genetic differences, blaKPC-containing pKpQiL-like IncFII(k2)-IncFIB(pQiL) plasmids show a high degree of sequence similarity. The phylogenetic distance as determined using Roary showed the highest degree of discriminatory power between the epidemiologically related and unrelated plasmids.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.