Abstract
The Home Office is currently engaged in a review of the homicide law, which includes consideration of the Law Commission's report Murder, Manslaughter and Infanticide, published in November 2006, which recommended three principal offences—first and second degree murder, and a redefined manslaughter. Through an analysis of a sample of murder and manslaughter prosecutions, this article offers some timely evidence of the way in which the law works in practice. In particular, it suggests there is evidence—not mere anecdotes—that occasionally the verdicts reached by the courts do not seem to sit comfortably with the law as stated in books, and that whilst some of these apparent ‘discrepancies' may be attributed to the vagaries of the jury, it is likely that the way in which those who investigate, prosecute and defend homicide cases also play an important role here.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
