Distinctive clinicopathological features of adenocarcinoma in situ and minimally invasive adenocarcinoma of the lung: A retrospective study

Abstract

ObjectivesThe aim of this study was to investigate distinguishing clinicopathological features, in addition to histological invasiveness, in adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS) and minimally invasive adenocarcinoma (MIA) of the lung. Materials and methodsPatients with lung adenocarcinoma who underwent surgery at our hospital between 2007 and 2014 were reviewed, focusing on computed tomography (CT) images, operative procedures and clinical outcomes, histopathology, Ki-67 immunostaining, and EGFR-mutation status. EGFR mutations were examined using a peptide nucleic acid–locked nucleic acid PCR clamp method. Group comparisons were investigated by Mann–Whitney U or Fisher’s exact tests. ResultsOf 629 patients with lung adenocarcinoma who underwent surgery, 91 (14%) of 103 AIS (n = 34) or MIA (n = 69) tumors were reviewed. The ratio of male to female patients with MIA compared to AIS was significantly higher (p < 0.02). Of 103 tumors, 99 (96%) were non-mucinous. By CT, 74% of AIS appeared as pure ground-glass nodules and 75% of MIAs as part-solid ground-glass nodules. Pathological tumor diameters and Ki-67 labeling index (LI) values were significantly greater for MIAs compared to AIS (p < 0.001 for both). A Ki-67 LI of ≥2.8% indicated the presence of an MIA rather than an AIS. EGFR mutations were more frequently detected in MIAs (33/69, 48%) than AIS (9/34, 26%; p = 0.055). The ratio of exon 19 deletions to exon 21 missense mutations in MIAs tended to be higher than those in AIS (p = 0.06). Patients did not experience a local recurrence or metastasis after AIS and MIAs were removed by wedge resection, segmentectomy or lobectomy. Five-year recurrence-free survival rates were 100%. ConclusionDespite similar surgical outcomes for AIS and MIAs, we found differences in terms of gender, tumor diameters, CT findings, Ki-67 LI and a subset of EGFR mutations, highlighting the validity of classifying the two subtypes.