Abstract

Neuron specific enolase (NSE) is widely used as a neuro-endocrine marker. However the presence of NSE in many non-neuroendocrine tissues has raised questions on the specificity of NSE. We have investigated NSE immunoreactivity (NSA-ag), gamma-enolase activity and total enolase activity in small cell lung cancer (SCLC) cell lines. During well-controlled exponential growth comparison of NSE-ag content and gamma-enolase activity with the doubling-time (Td) and NSE-ag content with gamma-enolase and total enolase activity led to a clear distinction of two types of cell line: variant cell lines plus part of the classic cell lines (type I) and the remaining classic cell lines (type II). The distinction was based upon both an abrupt 6-fold increase of gamma-enolase activity and an 18-fold increase of NSE-ag, which for the larger part was enzymatically inactive. Within each group the increase of NSE-ag content was significantly correlated with the increase of gamma-enolase activity and both NSE-ag content and gamma-enolase activity increased linearly with Td. It is concluded that gamma-enolase seems to be associated with the regulation of growth rate and that a compound with the gamma-enolase antigen but without enzyme activity can distinguish two different classes of SCLC cell lines. Furthermore the demonstration that NSE-ag can represent the active enzyme as well as an enzymatically inactive compound may explain why a controversy about neuron- or non-specificity of NSE exists.

Highlights

  • We have investigated the relationship between Neuron specific enolase (NSE)

  • ENZYMATICALLY INACTIVE NSE IN small cell lung cancer (SCLC)-CELL LINES 1067 showed only immunoreactivity migrating on gel as Wenolase

  • It has been shown to be a clinically reliable tool to monitor the course of the disease (Cooper et doubling-time of NSE at relapse was highly significantly correlated with survival from time of relapse (Splinter et al, 1987b) and pretreatment-values were shown to have prognostic value by some (J0rgenson et al, 1988), but not by others (Van der Gaast et al, 1991)

Read more

Summary

Materials and methods

The SCLC-cell lines were generously provided by the Dept. of Clinical Immunology, University of Groningen, The Netherlands. The mean ALAAD-activity of only the classic cell lines in both groups was similar (0.805 ± 0.574 and 0.818 ± 0.606 mU 10-6 cells, P = 0.9) and the mean enolase-activity of the left and the right group was 0.856 ± 0.213 and 0.624 ± 0.117 U mg-' protein respectively (P = 0.02). The mean ratio for type I cell lines was 635 ± 144 ng U ' and for the right group 2994 ± 350 ng U-' (P

Findings
A A vn 0
Discussion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.