Abstract

Since its very onset, the concept and definition of the informal sector has been a subject of debate both at the national and international levels. Existing literature uses the terms ‘informal sector’ and ‘unorganized sector’ interchangeably. However, in India, the characteristics of enterprises in the informal and non-informal unorganized manufacturing sectors are different and, thus, it is not justifiable to consider the informal and unorganized sector interchangeably for the manufacturing sector. Thus, the objective of this paper is to test the hypothesis on whether or not the total factor productivity growth (TFPG) of the informal manufacturing sector is different from the non-informal unorganized manufacturing sector. TFPG is decomposed into technical efficiency change and technological change. Later, technical efficiency change is further decomposed by pure efficiency change and scale efficiency change. Results show that the average TFPG of the non-informal sector is higher than the informal sector. The informal sector heavily concentrates in own account small enterprises, whereas the non-informal unorganized sector concentrates only in directory manufacturing enterprises (DME). Due to large in size, DME avails the advantages of economies of scale, which, in turn, helps the units for more growth in terms of total factor productivity growth. The main reason for productivity decrease of the enterprises, besides technology regress and the lack of adequate investments, is the limitation of activities and scale along with the optimal allocation of resources. This study provides a basis on how policies can be designed for enhancing the total factor productivity growth of the informal sector.

Highlights

  • Since it very onset, the concept and definition of informal sector has been a subject of debate both at the national and international levels. Hart (1970) first introduced this sector as unregulated economic enterprises

  • The mean technical efficiency change and technological change are higher in the non-informal sector than those of the informal sector

  • Results of the disaggregate analysis show that total factor productivity growth (TFPG) of the informal sector is higher as compared to the non-informal sector across all economic activities

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The concept and definition of informal sector has been a subject of debate both at the national and international levels. Hart (1970) first introduced this sector as unregulated economic enterprises. Even though most of the international studies have used the term “informal sector”, Central Statistical Organization (CSO) in India introduces this sector as “unorganized sector” in its report on National Accounts Statistics. An explicit definition of the informal sector in the Indian context distinguishing between unorganized and informal sector is provided by National Sample Survey Organization (2000). The informal sector incorporates the unincorporated proprieties or partnership enterprises of the Annual Survey of Industries (ASI). In addition to the unincorporated proprieties or partnership enterprises, enterprises run by cooperative societies, trusts, private and limited companies are included. According to NCEUS (2008), the informal sector consists of all unincorporated private enterprises owned by individuals and households engaged in the sale and production of goods and services operated on a proprietary or partnership basis and with less than ten total workers

Objectives
Methods
Findings
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call