Abstract
What does it mean for theological anthropology and for soteriology that the notion of a human being is difficult to delineate in light of human evolution? Should the difficulty related to defining what counts as a human being have impact on theological anthropology or soteriology? Instead of offering an affirmative answer to the questions, it is suggested that Niels Henrik Gregersen's notion of Deep Incarnation may prove to be a fruitful point of departure for a more encompassing notion of the whole evolutionary process that allows for a wider notion of soteriology as well. Christology is suggested as the theological answer to the empirical realization that the evolution of humanity is unfinished.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
