Abstract

Abstract. For the radiative impact of individual climate forcings, most previous studies focused on the global mean values at the top of the atmosphere (TOA), and less attention has been paid to surface processes, especially for black carbon (BC) aerosols. In this study, the surface radiative responses to five different forcing agents were analyzed by using idealized model simulations. Our analyses reveal that for greenhouse gases, solar irradiance, and scattering aerosols, the surface temperature changes are mainly dictated by the changes of surface radiative heating, but for BC, surface energy redistribution between different components plays a more crucial role. Globally, when a unit BC forcing is imposed at TOA, the net shortwave radiation at the surface decreases by -5.87±0.67 W m−2 (W m−2)−1 (averaged over global land without Antarctica), which is partially offset by increased downward longwave radiation (2.32±0.38 W m−2 (W m−2)−1 from the warmer atmosphere, causing a net decrease in the incoming downward surface radiation of -3.56±0.60 W m−2 (W m−2)−1. Despite a reduction in the downward radiation energy, the surface air temperature still increases by 0.25±0.08 K because of less efficient energy dissipation, manifested by reduced surface sensible (-2.88±0.43 W m−2 (W m−2)−1) and latent heat flux (-1.54±0.27 W m−2 (W m−2)−1), as well as a decrease in Bowen ratio (-0.20±0.07 (W m−2)−1). Such reductions of turbulent fluxes can be largely explained by enhanced air stability (0.07±0.02 K (W m−2)−1), measured as the difference of the potential temperature between 925 hPa and surface, and reduced surface wind speed (-0.05±0.01 m s−1 (W m−2)−1). The enhanced stability is due to the faster atmospheric warming relative to the surface, whereas the reduced wind speed can be partially explained by enhanced stability and reduced Equator-to-pole atmospheric temperature gradient. These rapid adjustments under BC forcing occur in the lower atmosphere and propagate downward to influence the surface energy redistribution and thus surface temperature response, which is not observed under greenhouse gases or scattering aerosols. Our study provides new insights into the impact of absorbing aerosols on surface energy balance and surface temperature response.

Highlights

  • Black carbon (BC) aerosols, emitted from diesel engines, biofuels, forest fires, incomplete combustion, and biomass burning, could significantly impact the Earth’s climate by changing its radiative balance or by perturbing the hydro-Published by Copernicus Publications on behalf of the European Geosciences Union.T

  • Tang et al.: Distinct surface response to black carbon aerosols logical cycle (Ramanathan et al, 2001; Menon et al, 2002). The former is realized via absorbing solar radiation, causing positive effective radiative forcing (ERF) at the top of the atmosphere (TOA) and warming the climate (Ramanathan and Carmichael, 2008; Bond et al, 2013; Myhre et al, 2013b), while the latter is partly through modifying the microphysical properties of clouds (Koch and Del Genio, 2010; Bond et al, 2013; Boucher et al, 2013), which could further impact ERF

  • BC particles firstly heat the atmosphere and cause surface cooling locally, but they warm both the surface and the atmosphere due to atmospheric circulation and mixing processes. When it comes to surface response, Ramanathan et al (2001) suggested that the reduced solar radiation at the surface is possibly counteracted by reduced evaporation, which further perturbs the hydrological cycle

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Tang et al.: Distinct surface response to black carbon aerosols logical cycle (Ramanathan et al, 2001; Menon et al, 2002) The former is realized via absorbing solar radiation, causing positive effective radiative forcing (ERF) at the top of the atmosphere (TOA) and warming the climate (Ramanathan and Carmichael, 2008; Bond et al, 2013; Myhre et al, 2013b), while the latter is partly through modifying the microphysical properties of clouds (e.g., albedo and lifetime) (Koch and Del Genio, 2010; Bond et al, 2013; Boucher et al, 2013), which could further impact ERF. BC particles firstly heat the atmosphere and cause surface cooling locally, but they warm both the surface and the atmosphere due to atmospheric circulation and mixing processes When it comes to surface response, Ramanathan et al (2001) suggested that the reduced solar radiation at the surface is possibly counteracted by reduced evaporation, which further perturbs the hydrological cycle. Myhre et al (2018) concluded that BC aerosols can change the global hydrological cycle by suppressing sensible heat flux at the surface and attributed this suppression to the changes of air stability

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call